Hillary Clinton's Greatest Scandal

Post Reply
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 12:41 am

Hillary Clinton's Greatest Scandal

#1 Post by ArgueMax » Thu Nov 27, 2014 1:08 am

I find it fascinating that, what I would regard as, the least important of reasons why a politician's career is sunk is the one that the public latches on to and use to denounce a beloved candidate whom they put all their hopes and passions into.

I believe that the reasons why Hillary Clinton should be disregarded as a presidential candidate should include:
  • She did not achieve anything noteworthy as Secretary of State, or as Senator or even as First Lady.
  • At times she has demonstrated that she is incapable of making intelligent and rational decisions.
  • She is unwilling to compromise or work with people or admit when she is wrong on an issue or subject.
  • She is verbally abusive to her staff and, on at least one occasion, physically abusive in an event collaborated by eye witnesses in The Secret Service.
  • She says things that only a radical communist would say.
  • She is not the same person in private as she is in public.
  • She will only debate, discuss or interview with people that she and her staff has determined will only ask her soft-ball questions on topics that do not really matter.
But all this is not what is important to the voting public.

The most damaging thing to a politician's career is marital infidelity.

There has been an open secret in the Clinton camp for decades. It has been known in the Clinton inner circle and, to a degree, among many people in Little Rock. It has never been mentioned in the main stream media partly because of the political bias in the media and partly because it involved Hillary, not Bill and no one votes for the First Lady. Since Hillary was never really close to even securing the Democratic Nomination in 2008, it was not necessary to drag out this unseemly and personal family issue.

But the scandal mentioned in this document will torpedo Hillary's hopes to be president just as Gary Hart's presidency was torpedoed in the 1980's.

The last time Gary Hart ran for president, his popularity was so great that he was regarded as a "shoe in" for the presidency (does that sound familiar?). But the chances that he could be the president went from certain to impossible because of his affair with Donna Rice.

I have to say at this point that, no, Hillary's scandal does NOT involve Gary Hart or Donna Rice. I have to write this as a preemptive strike against what I can foresee will be some of the responses to this document. I only mention the Hart case as an example how, when someone is running for president, a revelation of infidelity can destroy the candidate's chances.

Hillary's scandal happened long ago and this fact is the response I sometimes receive from Liberal Democrats who tell me it is "ancient history". It would be regarded as unimportant and "ancient history" if Hillary was just the First Lady, Secretary of State or even a Senator, but she is reaching for the iconic status of The President of the United States now and this is really the first real time that she has any chance. And, as fate would have it, the American public is now clearly demonstrating that ancient history does matter when someone is to be raised to an iconic status. This is because of what is currently happening now, as of November, 2014, to Bill Cosby.

For those who do not know or do not remember how Bill Cosby has recently been transformed from highly beloved celebrity into a man who is hated as if he was a lowly criminal, let me explain how this happened. The "First Annual Comedy Awards" along with the publication of Mark Whitaker's book, "Cosby: His Life and Times" was the first step in Cosby's downfall. For years, the entertainment industry had been voicing the need to have some sort of annual comedy awards show and presentation separate from the Oscars and the Emmys. It was long overdue and I have no idea what took so long for this to materialize but this year was the first year that this happened. Like similar awards such as the Oscars, it was decided that the crowning crescendo of the televised program would be a "Lifetime Achievement Award". And this award went to Cosby. Also this year, Mark Whitaker wrote a book about Cosby's life and was on the talk show circuit. The rumors that Bill Cosby had legal problems with women that was settled out of court was common knowledge and an open secret to anyone who had watched Bill Cosby's career closely. In fact, this was brought up in several televised interviews with Whitaker. His response was generally the same. He would say that since Cosby had avoided conviction, it was not worth mentioning in the book.

That was the first step. The second step happened after the First Annual Comedy Lifetime Achievement Award and after the biography praising Bill Cosby's life. What happened was the start of speculations that new television programs were in the works designed to elevate Bill Cosby from a celebrity to an icon status that would cement him in the history books of American culture for eternity.

The fact that Bill Cosby is famous for being critical of other black comedians whose performances are too obscene, and the fact that Bill Cosby is also famous for being critical of social behavior that is indecent was too much for comedian Hannibal. He openly called Bill Cosby a rapist in a stand-up comedy performance that was recorded on cell phones that was posted online. He cited the legal papers as proof that anyone could find online.

That was when the women who he had violated could no longer stay silent, and they started to come forward one after the other.

The point is, Bill Cosby, as popular and beloved as he was, could not stand up to the scrutiny and personal evaluation required to go from a celebrity status to an Icon status.

No position or job is more iconic as President of the United States. Hillary does not pass the scrutiny and personal evaluation as well. That which has crashed Bill Cosby's career is also about to destroy Hilary Clinton's career.

It has been an open secret in the Clinton camp for decades that Webb Hubbell is Chelsea Clinton biological father.

We had our suspicions during Bill Clinton's presidency that his only daughter did not look anything like him. We figured, at the time, that maybe Bill and/or Hillary were late-bloomers and that, if a photo of how either Hillary or Bill looked when they were longer surfaced, then we would see that a young Bill Clinton or a young Hillary Rodham might have some resemblance to Chelsea Clinton.

But Chelsea has a different shape of head, nose, mouth, and chin to be Bill Clinton's daughter. And, as time went on, as she grew, she looked less and less like the man who we assumed was her biological father and more like a dead ringer to Hillary's partner at the Rose Law Firm, Webb Hubbell.

I do not like writing about supposition or theories unless there is a good chance that what I am writing is true. There is a good chance what I am writing is true (and I will address the idea of it not being true later here). My personal experience has been that I can always see a family resemblance in the facial features of a girl and her father. I remember how my brother and his wife were in their college years and when I look at their college-age daughters now I can see clearly how their faces look like a morph of their parents when they were their age. I am sure everyone who is reading this can think of examples. But this is also true with famous people. There is no doubt who Tory Spelling's father was. There is no doubt who is the father and mother of Jamie Leigh Curtis.

Part of the reason why I think this is true is because I first heard the rumor not from Republicans or the Tea Party or Right-Wing Pundits. I heard it from sources close to the Clintons:
  1. Gennifer Flowers, a long-time mistress, has stated that Bill Clinton told her that Webb Hubbell was Chelsea Clinton's biological father. She has even stated that, to her surprise, Bill asked her if she could think of someone who could help father a child with Hillary since Bill and Hillary were having some difficulty.
  2. Larry Nicholes, a long-time Clinton aid, has said in interviews that Bill Clinton told him that he (Clinton) was sterile. When asked about Chelsea, Clinton told Nicholes that "Webb Hubbell sired her".
  3. Historian Dave Martin says that undisputed evidence and belief has been around for a long time.
  4. Journalist Chris Ruddy has stated that the fact that Webb Hubbell is Chelsea's biological father has been an open secret in Arkansas for decades.
If Bill Clinton is physically incapable of fathering a child (Nicholes told him this is a fact, after Nicholes asked Bill what to do about a paternity charge a woman was making), then what more proof do you need that the rumors are true?

What about the fact that it is obvious? If you show photos to an unbiased impartial person of the four: Webb Hubbell, Chelsea Clinton, Bill Clinton and Hillary, they will state it is beyond doubt that Webb is Chelsea's father. Just try it.

What about the fact that Chelsea seems to acknowledge it? If Chelsea thought the rumors were not true and wanted to deflect any suspicions, she would not have named her daughter "Charlotte" which is not only recognized as the name of a city North Carolina but it happens to be the city where Webb Hubbell is living.

I told a number of my Liberal friends that I was not going to post this particular blog on ArgueMax until I found out what Chelsea Clinton's blood type is. Today people tend to believe that the only way to determine paternity is by doing a DNA test. This is not true. I have learned from the days when I worked for the military that blood type can be used to determine paternity.

This is where my investigation and preparation for this blog gets interesting. There are a number of web sites that list a catalog of statistics about celebrities. For some reason, blood type is included in the details of the famous people listed on this web site. It seems that in some cultures, blood type is a meaningful thing. Virtually any famous person you can think of has their blood type told on these web sites. Even politicians like Hillary and Bill Clinton can be easily found online. Bill is AB Negative and Hillary is AB. But, curiously, Chelsea Clinton's blood type cannot be found. Even when I use the custom meta search engine from http://www.gelsana.com that uses a combination of national and international search engines, Chelsea Clinton's blood type is missing.

This is odd because -- although she currently seems devoted to charitable work -- Chelsea prides herself and markets herself as a former media celebrity having had worked for NBC News as a special correspondent. She is also listed in the motion picture database, IMDB.com

I took my research several steps further. I called the web master of one of the celebrity catalog web sites and she told me, in no uncertain terms, that the only reason that she can think of as to why Chelsea Clinton's blood type was unobtainable is that she is hiding it for personal paternity reasons.

After this, I decided to post the question on a number of websites that allows users to post questions and I saved links to these pages just in case I got an answer (gelsana.com/Chelsea Clinton Blood Type). I never got an answer. No one seems to know.

Next, I went directly to the source. I found that Chelsea is a frequent user of twitter. I sent her a number of tweets asking her directly what her blood type is. I never got a response. Next, I called the hospital in New York where Chelsea had her baby and told them that I worked for a web site and I explained how common it is for celebrities to allow the public to know their blood type. After being transferred a few times, the woman on the phone told me in a very stern tone that that information was not allowed to be released to a 3rd party because of HIPPA laws.

Think of this. The way Chelsea Clinton handles the information regarding her blood type is exactly as it would be if Bill was not her biological father and she had a reason for keeping this highly personal information private and from the pubic. What is more is this. The way Chelsea Clinton handles the information regarding her blood type is not at all as it would be if Bill was her biological father since it is such a common thing for celebrity types.

I have gotten all I can regarding blood types. So I turned my attention to eye color. Hillary's eyes are brown. Bill's eyes are a light blue with a slight greenish hew. Chelsea's eyes are gray. They are gray like polished stainless steel. As seen in this photo where it is obvious that her eye color matches the gray coat she is wearing.

As a side note, I would like to add here that Hillary Clinton has been lately wearing light blue contact lenses thus concealing her brown eye color. It is not far-fetched to assume that this is an attempt to have her eyes match Chelsea's eye color which does not match Hillary's or Bill's.

Now, I admit, that at first glance, light bluish-green looks a lot like steel-gray. One has to look at several photos and videos of Bill Clinton to see clearly that his eye color does not match Chelsea's.

Still, without a clear up-close photo of Web Hubbell I was reluctant to post this blog. Here is the photo I found. It is a good head-shot of Hubbell that he posed for a book he wrote:

It is a match. Webb Hubbell's eyes are not blue, they are not light blue, they are not light blue-green. They are steel-gray. They are exactly like Chelsea Clinton's

I went further in my research and I asked a genetic specialists what the odds were that Webb Hubbell is Chelsea's biological father. At first he told me that brown eyes are dominate so it is unlikely that Hillary's parents would have had the eye color that Chelsea has. After I told him the eye color of all four persons, he asked me if it was a known fact that Hillary and Webb had an affair around the time that Chelsea was conceived. I said, "Yes, this is a known fact". He told me, "Webb Hubbell is Chelsea's biological father". There was not a percentage he gave me. It was as if saying it was 100% true was not true enough. In his mind, it was simply a fact. There is no need to put a percentage on reality.

Plastic Surgery

Hillary loyalists who are not aware of this information seem to want to believe that there is some resemblance between Chelsea and Bill. I tell them to look at the photos of Chelsea prior to her plastic surgery. Chelsea has had some work done recently on her nose and chin -- seemingly to look more like Bill. I did not have to divulge the information that is practically public knowledge that Webb and Hillary had an affair after each were married to other people. It is so widely accepted that web sites that categorize pairings of famous people list three for Hillary Clinton. One was before she married Bill and Webb Hubbell is cited as one she had after she married Bill Clinton.
Even with the plastic surgery, there is more encoded in the DNA than just physical appearance. Chelsea has the same mannerisms and expressions that Webb Hubbell has. This pout-like scowl that Hubbell has seems unique to him and Chelsea.
The internet is full of images and comparisons between Webb and Chelsea. If you show an unbiased and impartial group pf persons photos of Chelsea prior to her plastic surgery and then show them this following photo of Webb Hubbell and Bill Clinton together, ten times out of ten, they will pick Webb Hubbell as Chelsea's father.
A key factor is that this information is a piece of the puzzle that makes Bill Clinton's strange and reckless behavior over the years finally make sense. It makes everything add up. If Bill Clinton is infertile, it explains why he chased countless women. It seems now to have been an attempt to fill a void he has in his soul for being unable to be a father.

It also explains Hillary's strange behavior in not telling Bill that she was pregnant at first. Bill Clinton learned that Hillary was pregnant after Hillary's doctor had given a press conference.

It Once happened to Me

When we were living in Silicon Valley, a co-worker of mine was desperately trying to have a baby. She was something of a "free spirit" and there was something wrong with the fertility of her boy friend. She approached me asking me if I could be a donor for her. No one had ever asked me something like this before and I never imagined ever being asked. So I asked some friends what they thought about it and they told me not to do it. They said that they had heard of some legal cases where an unmarried woman found herself unable to financially support her kids and the judge had ruled that the sperm donor was on the hook for financial support.

So I turned down the offer.

But here is an important point. It was never even imagined that I would have sex with my friend. It was always assumed by everybody that it would be done in a clinical environment.

This is not the case with Webb and Hillary. It is clear that all this happened nefariously with Hillary cheating on Bill. The common accepted mantra that Hillary is a victim and a hero is a myth.

By the way, my friend opted to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on the latest fertility treatments and had beautiful twin daughters with her mate. It was not the cheapest option but, in the long run, it was the best option.

Playing the Devil's Advocate

Let's assume, for a moment, that my conclusions in this blog are all wrong. Let's assume that, by some strange magic, the Clinton family structure is how we had assumed it is. If this is the case, than this makes Hillary look 100 times WORSE. First of all, since Bill Clinton is the primary source of this information against Hillary, this would mean that Hillary's own husband is unforgivably diabolical against her and this is an even more disgusting stain against Hillary. Secondly, if all this is untrue, then this disqualifies her to be president of the United States since it shows a glaringly dysfunctional management style. She should have done something decades ago to seize the rumors.

Why This Matters

Hillary apologists have told me that this does not matter if it is true. They have said it is ancient history. The fact that it is ancient history is part of the reason why, in fact, all this actually does matter. If this is true, and, come on, it is true, it means that Hillary is from a different era of swingers, free love, and it being OK for a woman to screw her way to the top of a law firm. Hillary is simply from a different era and no longer is representative of the American culture of today.

But that is not even the worse part. As president, Hillary is the face of our Republic presented to the world. She is our representative. She is whom we have collectively decided best represents us. This is bad.

Let me put it this way, if American business and policy makers went to Brazil and found that the president of Brazil (whom I might add has already been a woman once -- so much for your proverbial "glass ceiling") had a child with another man other than her husband, our enthusiasm and interest in doing business with the government of Brazil would be tarnished. How could we trust the president of Brazil if her own husband cannot trust her? How could we trust the country of Brazil, as a whole, if the population had carelessly, and with blind disregard, voted her into office?

This would be how the world would view and evaluate the United States if Hillary became president.

It matters for another reason. Since Hillary's record in The Senate, and in The State Department is dismal and disappointing, her supporters have turned to the idea that Hillary is a champion of woman's rights. As Secretary of State, she was a globe trotter and outspoken advocate for women all over the world. She presented herself as some sort of role model and almost a Mother Teresa-like character. This image is now obliterated and we are left with nothing to admire and idolize her for.

All this also means that what the detractors have been saying about Hillary all along has been true. This is proof that she is not the same person in private and in realty as she appears to be in public.

We should not have a different set of rules for Gary Hart, Bill Cosby and Hillary Clinton. Hillary's supporters who are passionate about fair and equal treatment for women are obligated to denounce her as a candidate for president.

It also matters for one more reason. This is the reason that people in the military naturally understand. The Presidency is a military position. The president is the Commander-In-Chief. Unethical behavior such as this would not be tolerated for an instant for a General, and Admiral or a Commanding Officer. The reasons are numerous and beyond the scope of this writing, but it is a determent to morale, and it also opens the door to the threat of blackmail and a security risk, among other things. It should not be tolerated for their boss, the president.

Be Part of the Real Revolution

We live in the Information Age. The kinds of false imagery and presentation techniques that have worked for the Clintons in the past, should not work today. They should not get away with what they used to get away with. Hillary supporters like to chant the sound byte, "be part of the revolution". But the real revolution is to NOT support Hillary Clinton for president. Her failure is a triumphant success for the United States. It will mean logic, reason, and rational thought has triumphed over schmooze, theater, and superficial salesmanship.

Arguemax.com is a Political Action Committee
Please donate to support this PAC and ensure the proper person is elected to the office of the presidency of the United States

© 2016 ArgueMax.com. Please do not copy without citing and linking back to the original source.
Please Join The ArgueMax.com Facebook Group Site: Click here!
Visit the ArgueMax.com Facebook site

Please like and share the ArgueMax.com facebook page:
[iframe]//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href= ... &height=80[/iframe]

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 12:41 am

Re: Hillary Clinton's Greatest Scandal

#2 Post by ArgueMax » Sat Mar 14, 2015 2:35 am

When JFK was president, the press knew that there was a line not to cross when reporting his behavior. Also, I am sure that no one would believe the true stories of his affairs if it was reported during his lifetime. It was not until after JFK was gone, did the scope and extent of his affairs came to light. The same might have been true with Hillary but, because of the internet, this is not the case.

A knee-jerk reaction to this blog as been disbelief and dismissal. Well, I will repeat what I wrote earlier. If it is not true, IT IS MUCH WORSE. It reflects a gross failure in management. She could have made this all go away with a maternity test decades ago. She never did despite all the rumors that she should have known would come back to haunt her.

Just like Bill Cosby, her time is up.

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 12:41 am

Re: Hillary Clinton's Greatest Scandal

#3 Post by ArgueMax » Fri Apr 03, 2015 5:54 am

Snopes.com is a famous website for debunking rumors. There is nothing posted on that site about this scandal. I researched this topic as much as I could and would not have made this blog post if I thought there was a chance it is not true. Here are some more photos of Chelsea where it is obvious that she is Webb's daughter:



Posts: 2
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 1:03 am
Referral: Bill Thompson

Re: Hillary Clinton's Greatest Scandal

#4 Post by Everyeyeshallsee » Sat May 23, 2015 2:37 am

Well I have learned that there is information on these clintons, that I did not know...but it would takes books to write about the evils of these power hungry thugs, oops did I say that...yes...because its the truth.

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 12:41 am

Re: Hillary Clinton's Greatest Scandal

#5 Post by ArgueMax » Tue Sep 20, 2016 12:21 am

How Sensitive Information Remains Hidden

Of all the things I have written on this web site, this is the one thing that can actually get me into trouble. I am going to expose a secret here and now used by the United States Military and the Department of Defense.

Let me start with an analogy. The way workers protect expensive equipment and valuable raw materials at a construction site is to pile garbage or other disgusting unmentionable material on top of it. This often prevents thieves from acquiring a power saw as well as steers away college kids who want a few free planks of wood for a book shelve.

I just described how the practice of mixing something with literal BS served to protect important material and items, but this literal practice is also done figuratively by the United States Military as well as other powerful people and entities. The way to hide something is to mix it with refuse so that smart people will dismiss it outright. This is done in the world of highly sensitive information by the military. If the United States is testing a super secret spy plane, they will almost always mix information about it with propaganda about UFOs.

It works. It is highly effective, surprisingly. I have met many Russian nationals who dismiss the very existence of of the air force bases where spy planes are tested just because the term "Area 51" is synonymous with Extra Terrestrial Aliens and UFO's.

It is a very clever trick, and it uses psychology to misdirect people by painting something that is important as being something that is trash and tabloid nonsense.

The reason I am mentioning this trick here is because it is not only a tool that the military uses to hide important information but it is a practice also used by wealthy and important people who want to hide sensitive and private information.

I have discovered that the Clinton's have done this to hide the Webb Hubbell scandal. The Clinton's have managed to hide the existance of this scandal by mixing the story along with tabloid garbage by working with the British Tabloid television program, "The Word". I learned about this after speaking with several people who live overseas. They dismiss the validity of the Hubbell scandal simply because it was bundled with another obviously false rumor on this TV program notorious for presenting fantasy and garbage conspiracy theories.

This practice is not only a favorite of politicians to keep embarrassing information private but it is also done by the extremely wealthy to protect their privacy. This is why just the mentioning of "Rothschild" makes people dismiss anything about this family. The Rothchild's have been successful at equating their name with the occult and thus forcing people to dismiss anything their name is attached to.

The band new email scandal with the Rothschild's and Hillary Clinton is currently being dismissed and overlooked because of this.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests